All trades need to risk the same amount?
London, United Kingdom
+447351578251
info@traders.mba

All trades need to risk the same amount?

Support Centre

Welcome to our Support Centre! Simply use the search box below to find the answers you need.

If you cannot find the answer, then Call, WhatsApp, or Email our support team.
We’re always happy to help!

Table of Contents

All trades need to risk the same amount?

Some traders believe that all trades need to risk the same amount, thinking that consistent position sizing is the only path to disciplined trading. While using fixed risk per trade is a simple and effective method — especially for beginners — professional traders often vary their risk intelligently based on trade quality, confidence level, market conditions, and overall portfolio exposure. Not every setup deserves the same level of risk.

The belief that all trades need to risk the same amount overlooks the real-world complexity of managing diverse trade opportunities.

Why Fixed Risk Per Trade Is Common

There are good reasons why many traders start with equal risk per trade:

  • Simplicity: Risking the same percentage (like 1%) on each trade makes calculations easy and builds consistency.
  • Emotional control: Fixed risk reduces the temptation to “bet big” on emotional hunches.
  • Long-term survival: Consistent small risks protect against catastrophic losses during inevitable losing streaks.
  • Ideal for beginners: Fixed fractional risk (risking a set % of the account balance) is crucial when still developing discipline and strategy understanding.

However, as trading skills mature, more sophisticated approaches to risk allocation often become necessary.

When Adjusting Risk Per Trade Makes Sense

Professional traders intelligently vary their risk for several reasons:

  • Trade quality variation: Some setups are higher probability or offer better reward-to-risk ratios than others — they deserve slightly higher risk.
  • Market conditions: During clear trending markets, risk per trade can be increased; during choppy, uncertain periods, risk may be reduced.
  • Portfolio management: Risk must be adjusted if multiple open trades are correlated (e.g., buying several USD pairs simultaneously).
  • Account performance: Some traders lower risk during losing periods and increase slightly during winning streaks (but within strict rules).
  • Special events: High-conviction trades around major news events or technical breakouts may warrant strategic risk increases.

Thus, flexible risk management — not rigid sameness — matches professional trading reality.

How to Vary Risk Intelligently

Rather than betting emotionally, traders use structured methods to adjust risk:

  • Tiered risk system: For example, 0.5% for B-grade setups, 1% for A-grade setups, 1.5% for extremely high-conviction opportunities.
  • Volatility-based sizing: Adjust position size depending on current market volatility to maintain consistent dollar risk across different assets.
  • Session-specific risk: Some traders risk more during active sessions (like London or New York) and less during quieter periods.
  • Confidence scoring: Some advanced traders score setups based on technical, fundamental, and sentiment factors, adjusting risk accordingly.

Consistency comes not from risking exactly the same amount every time, but from applying a clear, disciplined process.

Dangers of Random Risk Changes

While adjusting risk can be powerful, it must be done with structure:

  • Avoid emotional betting: Increasing risk randomly after wins or losses leads to gambling behaviour and inevitable ruin.
  • Maintain overall risk control: No single trade should jeopardise the account regardless of how confident you feel.
  • Document adjustments: Any variation in risk should be planned, justified, and recorded — not improvised in the heat of the moment.

Controlled flexibility is the key — not chaos.

Examples of Smart Risk Adjustments

  • Trend continuation setup: A trader risks 1.5% instead of 1% on a clear higher-timeframe breakout aligned with strong fundamentals.
  • Range-trading setup: A mean-reversion trade in a choppy market gets only 0.5% risk due to lower probability.
  • Portfolio adjustment: A trader reduces position sizes when holding multiple trades exposed to the same currency or sector.

Each example shows that dynamic but disciplined risk management adapts to opportunity and danger.

Conclusion

It is completely false to believe that all trades need to risk the same amount. While consistent risk per trade is wise early in your journey, professional traders often adjust risk based on the strength of the setup, market conditions, and portfolio context. Smart risk management is dynamic, structured, and disciplined — helping traders protect capital while maximising strong opportunities.

To learn how to master intelligent risk allocation techniques and trade with true professional discipline, enrol in our expertly designed Trading Courses today.

Ready For Your Next Winning Trade?

Join thousands of traders getting instant alerts, expert market moves, and proven strategies - before the crowd reacts. 100% FREE. No spam. Just results.

By entering your email address, you consent to receive marketing communications from us. We will use your email address to provide updates, promotions, and other relevant content. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the "unsubscribe" link in any of our emails. For more information on how we use and protect your personal data, please see our Privacy Policy.

FREE TRADE ALERTS?

Receive expert Trade Ideas, Market Insights, and Strategy Tips straight to your inbox.

100% Privacy. No spam. Ever.
Read our privacy policy for more info.