If the backtest has a drawdown, it’s a bad system? This is a common misconception in trading, as many traders view drawdowns as a sign of failure or a problem with their strategy. However, drawdowns are a natural part of trading and do not necessarily indicate that a trading system is bad. In fact, even the most successful systems will experience drawdowns from time to time. It’s important to understand what drawdowns represent and how they should be interpreted when evaluating a trading strategy. This article explores why drawdowns are not inherently bad, how to assess them, and what you should consider when evaluating the performance of a trading system.

What Is a Drawdown?

A drawdown is the decline in the value of a trading account from its peak to its trough before a new peak is achieved. In simple terms, it represents a reduction in the value of your account after a series of losing trades. Drawdowns are typically expressed as a percentage, and they provide insight into the risk and volatility associated with a trading strategy.

For example, if your account reaches a high of $10,000, then drops to $8,000 before recovering back to $10,000, the drawdown would be 20%. Drawdowns are inevitable, even for profitable systems, and understanding their significance is crucial for evaluating a strategy’s long-term viability.

Why Drawdowns Are Inevitable in Trading

1. Market Volatility
Markets are inherently volatile, and even the best strategies cannot predict every market move with perfect accuracy. Drawdowns often occur when the market moves in an unexpected direction or experiences short-term fluctuations that disrupt your strategy’s performance. These market changes are normal and cannot always be avoided, but understanding their impact is key to managing them effectively.

2. Losses Are Part of the Process
Every trading strategy, regardless of its success rate, will experience losses. A drawdown simply reflects the inevitable nature of trading, where winning streaks are often followed by losing streaks. Even the most successful strategies will have periods of negative performance, but these losses are generally temporary, and the strategy may return to profitability after the drawdown.

3. Risk Management and Drawdowns
A well-designed trading strategy includes proper risk management techniques to limit the size of drawdowns. If a strategy has a drawdown but also has strong risk management measures in place (such as stop-loss orders, position sizing, and diversification), the drawdown is less of a concern because it’s a controlled part of the overall risk. A strategy that manages drawdowns effectively will be more resilient in the long run.

Why a Drawdown Does Not Indicate a Bad System

A drawdown in a backtest is not automatically an indication that a system is bad. Here are several reasons why:

1. Drawdowns Are Normal in Profitable Systems
Almost all trading systems, whether manual or automated, will experience drawdowns at some point. The key is to evaluate how deep and prolonged the drawdown is and whether the system has a plan for recovery. Many successful systems, especially those with high-risk/reward ratios, may experience significant drawdowns during certain periods, but their overall profitability over time is still positive. A strategy that recovers from drawdowns and generates profits in the long term is considered successful, even if it experiences temporary setbacks.

2. The Depth and Duration of the Drawdown Matter
The size of the drawdown and how long it lasts are the critical factors in assessing a system’s effectiveness. A large drawdown that lasts for a long period may signal that the strategy is not sustainable or that there’s an issue with its risk management. However, a smaller, short-term drawdown that’s quickly followed by a period of profitability is normal and should not be a cause for concern. It’s essential to look at the entire performance of the system, not just the drawdown, when making decisions.

3. A Strategy’s Risk/Reward Ratio Is More Important
A key metric to evaluate when assessing a trading system is its risk/reward ratio. A system that has a higher potential reward compared to the risk taken (i.e., larger profits than losses) is generally more resilient to drawdowns. Even if a strategy experiences a drawdown, it may still be profitable in the long term as long as its wins significantly outweigh its losses. For example, a system with a 1:3 risk/reward ratio may experience a drawdown but still generate a net profit over time due to its larger winning trades.

4. Backtest Results Should Be Evaluated Holistically
Rather than focusing on a single drawdown in a backtest, you should evaluate the entire performance of the strategy. Look at key performance metrics such as the win rate, average profit/loss, risk/reward ratio, maximum drawdown, and overall profitability. If the strategy is profitable overall and the drawdown is manageable, the system may still be effective despite experiencing losses at certain points.

How to Assess Drawdowns Effectively

When assessing a trading system and its performance in backtests, here are several factors to consider:

1. Maximum Drawdown
The maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the strategy’s performance over the backtest period. While some drawdown is expected, a large maximum drawdown relative to the strategy’s overall return may be a red flag. If a strategy experiences a deep drawdown and does not recover in a reasonable amount of time, this could indicate an issue with the system.

2. Duration of Drawdowns
It’s important to evaluate how long the drawdowns last. A brief drawdown that lasts for a few trades and is followed by recovery is generally not concerning. However, if a strategy experiences a prolonged drawdown that lasts for several months without recovering, it might indicate that the strategy is no longer viable or is overly sensitive to changing market conditions.

3. Risk/Reward Ratio
The risk/reward ratio plays a crucial role in understanding whether a drawdown is acceptable. A strategy with a high risk/reward ratio (for example, risking 1 to make 3) can afford larger drawdowns and still be profitable over time. Conversely, a strategy with a low risk/reward ratio may need to maintain a higher win rate and experience smaller drawdowns to be consistently profitable.

4. Frequency of Losses
Look at the frequency of losses within the backtest. A strategy that experiences frequent small losses followed by occasional large gains may have a higher tolerance for drawdowns. On the other hand, a strategy that suffers frequent large losses may be less sustainable, even if it generates occasional profits.

5. Recovery from Drawdowns
Evaluate how the system recovers from drawdowns. A good system should have a strategy for recovery, whether through adapting its approach or capitalising on new market conditions. If a strategy has a proven record of recovering from drawdowns and continuing to generate profits, the drawdown is simply part of the natural trading cycle.

Conclusion

If the backtest has a drawdown, it’s a bad system? This is a misconception. Drawdowns are an inevitable part of trading, even for the best strategies. Rather than viewing a drawdown as a sign of failure, it should be seen as a normal part of the market cycle. The key is to assess the depth, duration, and recovery of the drawdown, as well as the overall performance of the strategy. If the strategy is profitable in the long run, has a solid risk/reward ratio, and manages drawdowns effectively, it can still be a good system despite experiencing losses at times.

Learn how to assess drawdowns, manage risk, and build a resilient trading strategy with our expert-led Trading Courses designed to help you become a more successful and disciplined trader.